Why I switched to Pure and Natural Organic Toothpaste
75A couple of years ago, before I made the switch to pure and natural organic toothpaste, I didn't really think too much about what I put in my mouth every day. I mean, who thinks about that stuff. But I did suffer from regular and painful little blisters in my mouth. After doing some reading I discovered that in some people there may be a reaction to the ingredients in normal toothpaste, which made me think a lot harder about how I brushed my teeth. The more I discovered the more I was prompted to use organic toothpaste as well as organic shampoo and other organic cosmetics.
What is in a tube or non-organic toothpaste?
If you look that the label of a normal tube of toothpaste you'll see a long list of ingredients that you probably don't recognize. Some are really useful. I am a fan of fluoride, for instance, because I do believe it helps protect teeth from cavities. I know that a lot of people feel differently about it. But there is also a long list of ingredients that, frankly, I would rather not have near me or my family.
The first thing that I really don't like is a family of chemicals known as parabens. These are really common preservatives used in most cosmetics. Often they aren't listed as such on the label because they are allowed to be called innocent-sounding substances such as parfum or synthetic musk. Being preservatives, their purpose is to kill bacteria. All very well but what do they do to us?
But there are some studies the link parabens to breast cancer. They are also known to mimic the human hormone estrogen and some scientists worry that they may disrupt the hormonal system in people. They are especially concerned about the impact this may have on unborn babies and young children.
The government and FDA think that in small quantities parabens are safe. But I'd prefer not to take that risk.
What about Triclosan?
Many toothpastes also contain a substance known as Triclosan. This is an antibacterial agent and has become popular because people think that all bacteria are bad and should be killed. Thus many toothpastes advertise the fact that they have it. But more recently scientists and health professionals have become concerned about the widespread use of triclosan in everyday products such as soaps, household detergents and toothpaste. They fret that it may produce bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. This is already a huge problem in hospitals and I have no desire to add to it.
A more immediate concern is that triclosan can react with the chemicals in ordinary tap water to form more dangerous compounds such as chloroform gas, which is known to cause cancer. Studies have also shown it can disrupt the hormones of some animals.
For a winning smile
Sodium lauryl sulfate?
Sodium lauryl sulfate is another common additive to non-organic toothpaste. It helps make the toothpaste foam (you also find it in most shampoos though organic shampoo usually won't have it). This substance is one of the less harmful ones as it hasn't been linked to cancer or other major health issues. But is has been known to irritate the skin and for those with skin problems it can make them worse. It has also been linked to mouth sores (also known as canker sores). This was the reason I first tried out organic toothpaste.
Organic beauty products at Amazon.com
What about organic toothpaste?
There are a number of brands of organic toothpaste available. I prefer to use Green People, which is the most common natural toothpaste available in Britian. It comes in several flavours and has a lovely taste. I've also tried Tom's of Main and liked it, but not quite as much. The first thing you will notice when you switch to organic toothpaste is that it doesn't taste much like the normal variety. It is far less sweet (because it doesn't have artificial sweetener added to it) and is also a bit less foamy (once again it doesn't have the artificial foaming agent.
I have found that the taste and experience is actually a lot nicer than with ordinary toothpaste. It really does leave my mouth feeling quite fresh. My only worry is that many organic toothpastes that we get in Europe don't include fluoride, which I think is still a useful ingredient, and I do worry a bit about whether my teeth get the same level of protection. In America that isn't the same problem and one can find organic toothpaste that does include it (look for Sodium Fluoride on the label). One is Nature's Gate, that you can get through Amazon.com. Speaking of which, there is a huge range of reasonably cheap organic beauty products online through stores such as Amazon, which often has the best prices but it is still worth shopping around for the cheapest which may be on sale or discounted elsewhere.
CommentsLoading...
broozersnooze is right.
And one does not have to venture too far to start seeing red flags about it. Read the warnings on any toothpaste tube with fluoride. THe warning reads: "Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age. If more than used for brushing is accidentally swallowed, get medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away."
Come again? I am putting in my mouth something that requires me to contact a Poison Control Center if I swallow it? (Reminds me about those "environmentally friendly" fluorescent light bulbs that are all the rage, but contain mercury... give me an energy-efficient filament bulb instead!)
Even the ADA is clear that Sodium Fluoride shouldn't be ingested by kids age 6 or less (and yet why do we have in the market all those filtered water bottles with added fluoride for little kids?). The sacks of fluoride they dump in our water reservoirs is clearly marked as poison, and yet they keep hyping and pushing fluoride down our throats, literally.
I switched to Nature's Gate Natural Creme de Anise Toothpaste recently, switching from Tom's. Better tasting and more effective than Tom's... besides, Tom's was already giving me a "bad taste in the mouth" so to speak, being bought by Colgate and introducing a fluoride version of their toothpaste!
This isn't just about giving the consumer "options." We're not choosing over something frivolous like Cherry Coke vs regular Coke, but about raising awareness of a cumulative poison in our food supply. And yet all Tom's of Colgate, er Maine can say about it is a bland, P.C. "Some people do not want fluoride in their toothpaste." This gives me an idea of how concerned they are about this issue, which is not very much IMNSHO. This is even more important than the colorful claims of "No animal testing" and "sustainable practices" that appear in their revamped display box.
check out
Mistyhorizon2003's hub thats about Fluoride
This is stupid. Fluoride is good for you. In fact, it's great for you. You just need to be cautious around your YOUNG children (less than 6), because they're more likely to swallow toothpaste. There's a toxicity level, relative to weight, that you do want to avoid. But that's the same with radiation, we all agree that excessive radiation kills, but you CAN'T live a day without being exposed to SOME radiation. Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral... that's right, it's NATURAL, and therefore should be in organic toothpaste. Do some research before running down conspiracy road, man.
I use Tom's natural toothpaste and appreciate the good processing and ingredients. I am not a fan of flouride but it does have this as one of the ingredients. I am looking for a better brand. Enjoyed your hub and angle on using natural products.

















broozersnooze 19 months ago
FLOURIDE IS POISON and has NO place in a TRULY organic product. It is in MANY insecticides and rodenticides. This link provides DECADES of research proving how toxic this chemical is & that there is NO evidence of ANY benefit of using flouride: http://www.healthy-communications.com/fluorideasra
Fluoride, Teeth, and the Atomic Bomb by Joel Griffiths and Chris Bryson © July 1997 - Fluoride was the key chemical in atomic bomb production, according to the documents. One of the most toxic chemicals known, fluoride rapidly emerged as the leading chemical health hazard of the U.S. atomic bomb program—both for workers and for nearby communities, the documents reveal. The first lawsuits against the U.S. A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage, the documents show. Read the entire article: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flouride.htm